↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of source parameters using a non-Gaussian probability density function in a Bayesian framework

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of source parameters using a non-Gaussian probability density function in a Bayesian framework
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40623-023-01770-2
Authors

Nana Yoshimitsu, Takuto Maeda, Tomonari Sei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,049,751
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#345
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,545
of 425,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#14
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.