| Title |
Influence of calcium ion-modified implant surfaces in protein adsorption and implant integration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40729-021-00314-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Anitua, Andreia Cerqueira, Francisco Romero-Gavilán, Iñaki García-Arnáez, Cristina Martinez-Ramos, Seda Ozturan, Mikel Azkargorta, Félix Elortza, Mariló Gurruchaga, Isabel Goñi, Julio Suay, Ricardo Tejero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,636,252
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#17
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,738
of 433,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them