↓ Skip to main content

Histological, chemical, and morphological reexamination of the “heart” of a small Late Cretaceous Thescelosaurus

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Histological, chemical, and morphological reexamination of the “heart” of a small Late Cretaceous Thescelosaurus
Published in
The Science of Nature, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00114-010-0760-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy P. Cleland, Michael K. Stoskopf, Mary H. Schweitzer

Abstract

A three-dimensional, iron-cemented structure found in the anterior thoracic cavity of articulated Thescelosaurus skeletal remains was hypothesized to be the fossilized remains of the animal's four-chambered heart. This was important because the finding could be interpreted to support a hypothesis that non-avian dinosaurs were endothermic. Mammals and birds, the only extant organisms with four-chambered hearts and single aortae, are endotherms. The hypothesis that this Thescelosaurus has a preserved heart was controversial, and therefore, we reexamined it using higher-resolution computed tomography, paleohistological examination, X-ray diffraction analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. This suite of analyses allows for detailed morphological and chemical examination beyond what was provided in the original work. Neither the more detailed examination of the gross morphology and orientation of the thoracic "heart" nor the microstructural studies supported the hypothesis that the structure was a heart. The more advanced computed tomography showed the same three areas of low density as the earlier studies with no evidence of additional low-density areas as might be expected from examinations of an ex situ ostrich heart. Microstructural examination of a fragment taken from the "heart" was consistent with cemented sand grains, and no chemical signal consistent with a biological origin was detected. However, small patches of cell-like microstructures were preserved in the sandstone matrix of the thoracic structure. A possible biological origin for these microstructures is the focus of ongoing investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 33%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,128,312
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#155
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,421
of 195,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.