↓ Skip to main content

China’s decarbonization requires achievable deep underground research facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
China’s decarbonization requires achievable deep underground research facilities
Published in
Geoscience Letters, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40562-023-00265-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhaoxiang Chu, Yiming Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,270,577
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#121
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,167
of 340,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.