| Title |
Impact of renal replacement therapy strategy on beta-lactam plasma concentrations: the BETAKIKI study—an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01105-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damien Roux, Nicolas Benichou, David Hajage, Laurent Martin-Lefèvre, Nicolas de Prost, Nicolas Lerolle, Dimitri Titeca-Beauport, Eric Boulet, Julien Mayaux, Bruno Mégarbane, Khaoula Mahjoub, Dorothée Carpentier, Saad Nseir, Florence Tubach, Jean-Damien Ricard, Didier Dreyfuss, Stéphane Gaudry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 16% |
| Mexico | 4 | 13% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 10% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,532,244
of 25,011,008 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#180
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,164
of 412,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.