↓ Skip to main content

Safety of sheathless vascular access using braided 4 F selective catheters for common body interventions – a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Safety of sheathless vascular access using braided 4 F selective catheters for common body interventions – a retrospective study
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s42155-023-00350-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Nadjiri, Tobias Geith, Marc Mühlmann, Tobias Waggershauser, Philipp M. Paprottka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,053,543
of 24,058,913 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#58
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,471
of 410,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,058,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.