↓ Skip to main content

Incorporating random effects in biopharmaceutical control strategies

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Incorporating random effects in biopharmaceutical control strategies
Published in
AAPS Open, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s41120-022-00070-5
Authors

Thomas Oberleitner, Thomas Zahel, Marco Kunzelmann, Judith Thoma, Christoph Herwig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,305,319
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#6
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,259
of 395,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them