↓ Skip to main content

Summary of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting Detection Probability of Marsh Birds

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Summary of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Affecting Detection Probability of Marsh Birds
Published in
Wetlands, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13157-011-0155-x
Authors

Courtney J. Conway, James P. Gibbs

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Unspecified 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 58%
Environmental Science 18 28%
Unspecified 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,269,555
of 13,603,280 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#78
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,054
of 378,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,603,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.