↓ Skip to main content

Towards automatic text-based estimation of depression through symptom prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Towards automatic text-based estimation of depression through symptom prediction
Published in
Brain Informatics, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40708-023-00185-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirill Milintsevich, Kairit Sirts, Gaël Dias

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most common and comorbid mental disorders that impacts a person's day-to-day activity. In addition, MDD affects one's linguistic footprint, which is reflected by subtle changes in speech production. This allows us to use natural language processing (NLP) techniques to build a neural classifier to detect depression from speech transcripts. Typically, current NLP systems discriminate only between the depressed and non-depressed states. This approach, however, disregards the complexity of the clinical picture of depression, as different people with MDD can suffer from different sets of depression symptoms. Therefore, predicting individual symptoms can provide more fine-grained information about a person's condition. In this work, we look at the depression classification problem through the prism of the symptom network analysis approach, which shifts attention from a categorical analysis of depression towards a personalized analysis of symptom profiles. For that purpose, we trained a multi-target hierarchical regression model to predict individual depression symptoms from patient-psychiatrist interview transcripts from the DAIC-WOZ corpus. Our model achieved results on par with state-of-the-art models on both binary diagnostic classification and depression severity prediction while at the same time providing a more fine-grained overview of individual symptoms for each person. The model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) from 0.438 to 0.830 on eight depression symptoms and showed state-of-the-art results in binary depression estimation (73.9 macro-F1) and total depression score prediction (3.78 MAE). Moreover, the model produced a symptom correlation graph that is structurally identical to the real one. The proposed symptom-based approach provides more in-depth information about the depressive condition by focusing on the individual symptoms rather than a general binary diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,177,363
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#64
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,694
of 345,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.