| Title |
Outcomes in participants with ventilated nosocomial pneumonia and organ failure treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem: a subset analysis of the phase 3, randomized, controlled ASPECT-NP trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01084-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Andrew F. Shorr, Richard G. Wunderink, Marin H. Kollef, Jean-François Timsit, Brian Yu, Jennifer A. Huntington, Erin Jensen, Christopher J. Bruno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 8% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Colombia | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,095,326
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#122
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,403
of 488,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.