↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00221-016-4848-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. E. Hupfeld, C. J. Ketcham, H. D. Schneider

Abstract

The supplementary motor area (SMA) is believed to be highly involved in the planning and execution of both simple and complex motor tasks. This study aimed to examine the role of the SMA in planning the movements required to complete reaction time, balance, and pegboard tasks using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which passes a weak electrical current between two electrodes, in order to modulate neuronal activity. Twenty healthy adults were counterbalanced to receive either tDCS (experimental condition) or no tDCS (control condition) for 3 days. During administration of tDCS, participants performed a balance task significantly faster than controls. After tDCS, subjects significantly improved their simple and choice reaction time. These results demonstrate that the SMA is highly involved in planning and executing fine and gross motor skill tasks and that tDCS is an effective modality for increasing SMA-related performance on these tasks. The findings may be generalizable and therefore indicate implications for future interventions using tDCS as a therapeutic tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 22%
Psychology 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,606,181
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#550
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,253
of 416,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.