↓ Skip to main content

The AMADEUS score is not a sufficient predictor for functional outcome after high tibial osteotomy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The AMADEUS score is not a sufficient predictor for functional outcome after high tibial osteotomy
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40634-023-00575-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tizian Heinz, Felix Meller, Karsten Sebastian Luetkens, Philip Mark Anderson, Ioannis Stratos, Konstantin Horas, Maximilian Rudert, Stephan Reppenhagen, Manuel Weißenberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,131,617
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#232
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,164
of 371,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.