↓ Skip to main content

Multiple expressions of “expert” abnormality gist in novices following perceptual learning

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Multiple expressions of “expert” abnormality gist in novices following perceptual learning
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s41235-023-00462-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J. DiGirolamo, Megan DiDominica, Muhammad A. J. Qadri, Philip J. Kellman, Sally Krasne, Christine Massey, Max P. Rosen

Abstract

With a brief half-second presentation, a medical expert can determine at above chance levels whether a medical scan she sees is abnormal based on a first impression arising from an initial global image process, termed "gist." The nature of gist processing is debated but this debate stems from results in medical experts who have years of perceptual experience. The aim of the present study was to determine if gist processing for medical images occurs in naïve (non-medically trained) participants who received a brief perceptual training and to tease apart the nature of that gist signal. We trained 20 naïve participants on a brief perceptual-adaptive training of histology images. After training, naïve observers were able to obtain abnormality detection and abnormality categorization above chance, from a brief 500 ms masked presentation of a histology image, hence showing "gist." The global signal demonstrated in perceptually trained naïve participants demonstrated multiple dissociable components, with some of these components relating to how rapidly naïve participants learned a normal template during perceptual learning. We suggest that multiple gist signals are present when experts view medical images derived from the tens of thousands of images that they are exposed to throughout their training and careers. We also suggest that a directed learning of a normal template may produce better abnormality detection and identification in radiologists and pathologists.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%