↓ Skip to main content

The eutectic mixture local anesthetics (EMLA) cream is more effective on venipuncture pain compared with lidocaine tape in the same patients

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 146)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The eutectic mixture local anesthetics (EMLA) cream is more effective on venipuncture pain compared with lidocaine tape in the same patients
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40981-018-0210-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomomi Matsumoto, Tomohiro Chaki, Naoyuki Hirata, Michiaki Yamakage

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#22
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,568
of 346,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them