↓ Skip to main content

The stability of cooperative sourcing coalitions ‐ game theoretical analysis and experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Electronic Markets, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The stability of cooperative sourcing coalitions ‐ game theoretical analysis and experiment
Published in
Electronic Markets, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12525-013-0128-4
Authors

Daniel Beimborn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 4 33%
Unspecified 2 17%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 17%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#9,475,127
of 12,371,547 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Markets
#233
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,861
of 144,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Markets
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.