The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Understanding circulatory failure in sepsis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4514-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreas Bloch, David Berger, Jukka Takala |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 14% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 23% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 68% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,575,316
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,864
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,202
of 331,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#22
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.