↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cuss. fruit extract on sexual behaviors in male rats

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cuss. fruit extract on sexual behaviors in male rats
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40816-020-00227-3
Authors

Thuy Duong Dau, Minh Ha Le, Tran Thi Giang Huong Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Mai Dang, Thi Nguyet Que Do, Quynh Trang Tran

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,071,343
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#8
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,555
of 510,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them