↓ Skip to main content

Some identities of higher-order Bernoulli, Euler, and Hermite polynomials arising from umbral calculus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities and Applications, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Some identities of higher-order Bernoulli, Euler, and Hermite polynomials arising from umbral calculus
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1029-242x-2013-211
Authors

Dae San Kim, Taekyun Kim, Dmitry V Dolgy, Seog-Hoon Rim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#107
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,279
of 206,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.