| Title |
Obstetric fistula-induced incontinence and WASH programming in humanitarian settings: agenda for research, innovation, and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-022-00133-y |
| Authors |
Samuel Adjorlolo, Mary Ani-Amponsah, Emily Hammond, Maame Esi Pantsiwaa Nyame |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,872,697
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#99
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,546
of 419,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.