↓ Skip to main content

The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Naito, Mitsuru Ida, Ryo Yamamoto, Kazuya Tachibana, Keiko Kinouchi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 19 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 20%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,835,143
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#84
of 163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,379
of 353,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them