1,765 followers
RT @BJThorsen: Should continuous cover forestry have higher rotation ages? Probably not! Our new paper explains why: #springerlink https://…
RT @BJThorsen: Should continuous cover forestry have higher rotation ages? Probably not! Our new paper explains why: #springerlink https://…
Should continuous cover forestry have higher rotation ages? Probably not! Our new paper explains why: #springerlink https://t.co/gSmyqP6cbU