↓ Skip to main content

Deep learning and radiomic feature-based blending ensemble classifier for malignancy risk prediction in cystic renal lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Deep learning and radiomic feature-based blending ensemble classifier for malignancy risk prediction in cystic renal lesions
Published in
Insights into Imaging, January 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13244-022-01349-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quan-Hao He, Jia-Jun Feng, Fa-Jin Lv, Qing Jiang, Ming-Zhao Xiao

Abstract

The rising prevalence of cystic renal lesions (CRLs) detected by computed tomography necessitates better identification of the malignant cystic renal neoplasms since a significant majority of CRLs are benign renal cysts. Using arterial phase CT scans combined with pathology diagnosis results, a fusion feature-based blending ensemble machine learning model was created to identify malignant renal neoplasms from cystic renal lesions (CRLs). Histopathology results were adopted as diagnosis standard. Pretrained 3D-ResNet50 network was selected for non-handcrafted features extraction and pyradiomics toolbox was selected for handcrafted features extraction. Tenfold cross validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression methods were selected to identify the most discriminative candidate features in the development cohort. Feature's reproducibility was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficients and inter-class correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficients for normal distribution and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for non-normal distribution were utilized to remove redundant features. After that, a blending ensemble machine learning model were developed in training cohort. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy score (ACC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the performance of the final model in testing cohort. The fusion feature-based machine learning algorithm demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in external validation dataset (AUC = 0.934, ACC = 0.905). Net benefits presented by DCA are higher than Bosniak-2019 version classification for stratifying patients with CRL to the appropriate surgery procedure. Fusion feature-based classifier accurately distinguished malignant and benign CRLs which outperformed the Bosniak-2019 version classification and illustrated improved clinical decision-making utility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 22%
Unspecified 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#847
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,021
of 445,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.