| Title |
Comparison of image quality of two versions of deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm on a rapid kV-switching CT: a phantom study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology Experimental, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41747-022-00314-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Djamel Dabli, Maeliss Loisy, Julien Frandon, Fabien de Oliveira, Azhar Mohamad Meerun, Boris Guiu, Jean-Paul Beregi, Joël Greffier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,256,235
of 23,953,397 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology Experimental
#136
of 228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,670
of 437,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology Experimental
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,953,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.