| Title |
The computational thinking for science (CT-S) framework: operationalizing CT-S for K–12 science education researchers and educators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of STEM Education, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40594-022-00391-7 |
| Authors |
Timothy Hurt, Eric Greenwald, Sara Allan, Matthew A. Cannady, Ari Krakowski, Lauren Brodsky, Melissa A. Collins, Ryan Montgomery, Rena Dorph |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,245,291
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#119
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,135
of 472,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.