↓ Skip to main content

On the factors of Bitcoin’s value at risk

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
On the factors of Bitcoin’s value at risk
Published in
Financial Innovation, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40854-021-00297-3
Authors

Ji Ho Kwon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 7 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 16%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,778,526
of 23,437,201 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#91
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,626
of 438,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,437,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.