↓ Skip to main content

Endless bones most beautiful: Book review of Vivian de Buffrénil, Armand J. de Ricqlès, Louise Zylberberg, Kevin Padian (eds) 2021 Vertebrate Skeletal Histology and Paleohistology

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Endless bones most beautiful: Book review of Vivian de Buffrénil, Armand J. de Ricqlès, Louise Zylberberg, Kevin Padian (eds) 2021 Vertebrate Skeletal Histology and Paleohistology
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13358-022-00262-2
Authors

Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,881,258
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#137
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,108
of 433,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.