| Title |
A multicentric prospective observational study of diagnosis and prognosis features in ICU mesenteric ischemia: the DIAGOMI study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01092-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Bourcier, Guillaume Ulmann, Matthieu Jamme, Guillaume Savary, Marine Paul, Sarah Benghanem, Jean-Rémi Lavillegrand, Matthieu Schmidt, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Eric Maury, Alain Combes, Frédéric Pène, Nathalie Neveux, Alain Cariou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 31% |
| France | 3 | 9% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Other | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,373,735
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#153
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,940
of 471,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.