↓ Skip to main content

Simulated decadal variations of surface and subsurface phytoplankton in the upstream Kuroshio Extension region

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Simulated decadal variations of surface and subsurface phytoplankton in the upstream Kuroshio Extension region
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40645-022-00532-0
Authors

Tomoki Tozuka, Yoshikazu Sasai, Sayaka Yasunaka, Hideharu Sasaki, Masami Nonaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#13,197,746
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#189
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,495
of 435,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.