The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Role of nonoperative treatment in managing degenerative tears of the medial meniscus posterior root
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10195-013-0234-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Devdatta Suhas Neogi, Ashok Kumar, Laxman Rijal, Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Ashish Jaiman, Hira Lal Nag |
Abstract |
Tears of the medial meniscus posterior root can lead to progressive arthritis, and its management has no consensus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of supervised exercise therapy on patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 185 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
Researcher | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 18% |
Unknown | 58 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 16 | 9% |
Engineering | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 64 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#19,244,099
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#159
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,610
of 199,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.