↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary investigation of the 20 August 2014 debris flows triggered by a severe rainstorm in Hiroshima City, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Geoenvironmental Disasters, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 146)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Preliminary investigation of the 20 August 2014 debris flows triggered by a severe rainstorm in Hiroshima City, Japan
Published in
Geoenvironmental Disasters, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40677-015-0025-6
Authors

Fawu Wang, Ying-Hsin Wu, Hufeng Yang, Yuta Tanida, Atsushi Kamei

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,644,824
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#30
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,954
of 264,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoenvironmental Disasters
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them