↓ Skip to main content

0438. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the pattern of breathing during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. A pilot study in a mild ards porcine model

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
0438. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the pattern of breathing during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. A pilot study in a mild ards porcine model
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-2-s1-p28
Authors

M Pellegrini, G Perchiazzi, A Ronéus, I Andersson, T Fiore, A Larsson, G Hedenstierna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,646,171
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#275
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,840
of 253,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.