↓ Skip to main content

Source rupture process of the 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori earthquake: how did the two subparallel faults rupture?

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Source rupture process of the 2011 Fukushima-ken Hamadori earthquake: how did the two subparallel faults rupture?
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1880-5981-66-101
Authors

Miho Tanaka, Kimiyuki Asano, Tomotaka Iwata, Hisahiko Kubo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 77%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,310
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,782
of 247,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.