| Title |
The role of miRNAs in viral myocarditis, and its possible implication in induction of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines-induced myocarditis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the National Research Centre, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42269-022-00955-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine AbdelMassih, Hala Agha, Sonia El-Saiedi, Amal El-Sisi, Meryam El Shershaby, Hanya Gaber, Habiba-Allah Ismail, Nadine El-Husseiny, Abeer Reda Amin, Aly ElBoraie, Aya Ayad, Esraa Menshawey, Fady Sefein, Ibrahim Ihab Osman, Mai Moursi, Maram Hanafy, Mariam Sherif Abdelaziz, Mariem Badr Arsanyous, Mariam Khaled-Ibn-El-Walid, Marwa Gamal Tawfik, Menna Habib, Mina Ehab Mansour, Mirette Ashraf, Mohamed Ayman Khattab, Nada Alshehry, Nada Hafez, Naheel Essam ElDeeb, Nirvana Ashraf, Noha Khalil, Noheir Ismail AbdElSalam, Noura Shebl, Nouran Gamal Ali Hafez, Nourhan Hatem Youssef, Odette Bahnan, Passant Ismail, Peter Kelada, Rahma Menshawey, Rana Saeed, Reem Jalal Husseiny, Reem Yasser, Safa Sharaf, Veronia Adel, Youstina Naeem, Youstina Nagy Farid Nicola, Aya Kamel, Rafeef Hozaien, Raghda Fouda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 11% |
| France | 11 | 6% |
| Italy | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 132 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 173 | 92% |
| Scientists | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#353,455
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#2
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,812
of 495,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them