| Title |
Pulsed Eddy Current Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10033-017-0122-4 |
| Authors |
Ali Sophian, Guiyun Tian, Mengbao Fan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 82 | 39% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 88 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
#17
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,039
of 310,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.