↓ Skip to main content

Generalized Hampel Filters

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Generalized Hampel Filters
Published in
ADS, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13634-016-0383-6
Authors

Ronald K. Pearson, Yrjö Neuvo, Jaakko Astola, Moncef Gabbouj

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 26%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 47 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 41 25%
Computer Science 14 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 8%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,625
of 26,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,127
of 388,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#52
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.