| Title |
Pharmacological activities of leaf and bark extracts of a medicinal mangrove plant Avicennia officinalis L.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Phytoscience, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40816-018-0072-0 |
| Authors |
Swagat Kumar Das, Dibyajyoti Samantaray, Archana Mahapatra, Nityasundar Pal, Rudranarayan Munda, Hrudayanath Thatoi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,828,339
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#9
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,833
of 330,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them