Title |
Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-3-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erika Parmentier-Decrucq, Julien Poissy, Raphaël Favory, Saad Nseir, Thierry Onimus, Mary-Jane Guerry, Alain Durocher, Daniel Mathieu |
Abstract |
Transport of critically ill patients for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures is at risk of complications. Adverse events during transport are common and may have significant consequences for the patient. The objective of the study was to collect prospectively adverse events that occurred during intrahospital transports of critically ill patients and to determine their risk factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 30% |
Spain | 7 | 23% |
Canada | 4 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 208 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 34 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
Other | 28 | 13% |
Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
Other | 38 | 18% |
Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 19% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 51 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#377,568
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#35
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,509
of 212,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them