| Title |
The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12302-022-00680-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiba Mohammed Taha, Reza Aalizadeh, Nikiforos Alygizakis, Jean-Philippe Antignac, Hans Peter H. Arp, Richard Bade, Nancy Baker, Lidia Belova, Lubertus Bijlsma, Evan E. Bolton, Werner Brack, Alberto Celma, Wen-Ling Chen, Tiejun Cheng, Parviel Chirsir, Ľuboš Čirka, Lisa A. D’Agostino, Yannick Djoumbou Feunang, Valeria Dulio, Stellan Fischer, Pablo Gago-Ferrero, Aikaterini Galani, Birgit Geueke, Natalia Głowacka, Juliane Glüge, Ksenia Groh, Sylvia Grosse, Peter Haglund, Pertti J. Hakkinen, Sarah E. Hale, Felix Hernandez, Elisabeth M.-L. Janssen, Tim Jonkers, Karin Kiefer, Michal Kirchner, Jan Koschorreck, Martin Krauss, Jessy Krier, Marja H. Lamoree, Marion Letzel, Thomas Letzel, Qingliang Li, James Little, Yanna Liu, David M. Lunderberg, Jonathan W. Martin, Andrew D. McEachran, John A. McLean, Christiane Meier, Jeroen Meijer, Frank Menger, Carla Merino, Jane Muncke, Matthias Muschket, Michael Neumann, Vanessa Neveu, Kelsey Ng, Herbert Oberacher, Jake O’Brien, Peter Oswald, Martina Oswaldova, Jaqueline A. Picache, Cristina Postigo, Noelia Ramirez, Thorsten Reemtsma, Justin Renaud, Pawel Rostkowski, Heinz Rüdel, Reza M. Salek, Saer Samanipour, Martin Scheringer, Ivo Schliebner, Wolfgang Schulz, Tobias Schulze, Manfred Sengl, Benjamin A. Shoemaker, Kerry Sims, Heinz Singer, Randolph R. Singh, Mark Sumarah, Paul A. Thiessen, Kevin V. Thomas, Sonia Torres, Xenia Trier, Annemarie P. van Wezel, Roel C. H. Vermeulen, Jelle J. Vlaanderen, Peter C. von der Ohe, Zhanyun Wang, Antony J. Williams, Egon L. Willighagen, David S. Wishart, Jian Zhang, Nikolaos S. Thomaidis, Juliane Hollender, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Emma L. Schymanski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Luxembourg | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 25 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,037,954
of 25,391,471 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#64
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,142
of 438,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.