| Title |
Predicting responders to prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 using machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01070-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tariq A. Dam, Luca F. Roggeveen, Fuda van Diggelen, Lucas M. Fleuren, Ameet R. Jagesar, Martijn Otten, Heder J. de Vries, Diederik Gommers, Olaf L. Cremer, Rob J. Bosman, Sander Rigter, Evert-Jan Wils, Tim Frenzel, Dave A. Dongelmans, Remko de Jong, Marco A. A. Peters, Marlijn J. A. Kamps, Dharmanand Ramnarain, Ralph Nowitzky, Fleur G. C. A. Nooteboom, Wouter de Ruijter, Louise C. Urlings-Strop, Ellen G. M. Smit, D. Jannet Mehagnoul-Schipper, Tom Dormans, Cornelis P. C. de Jager, Stefaan H. A. Hendriks, Sefanja Achterberg, Evelien Oostdijk, Auke C. Reidinga, Barbara Festen-Spanjer, Gert B. Brunnekreef, Alexander D. Cornet, Walter van den Tempel, Age D. Boelens, Peter Koetsier, Judith Lens, Harald J. Faber, A. Karakus, Robert Entjes, Paul de Jong, Thijs C. D. Rettig, Sesmu Arbous, Sebastiaan J. J. Vonk, Tomas Machado, Willem E. Herter, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Patrick J. Thoral, Armand R. J. Girbes, Mark Hoogendoorn, Paul W. G. Elbers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 17% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Senegal | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,674,883
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#360
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,110
of 442,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.