↓ Skip to main content

Best proximity point theorems for rational proximal contractions

Overview of attention for article published in Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 185)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Best proximity point theorems for rational proximal contractions
Published in
Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1687-1812-2013-95
Authors

Hemant Kumar Nashine, Poom Kumam, Calogero Vetro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Professor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 6 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#39
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,351
of 211,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.