Title |
Helmet noninvasive support for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: rationale, mechanism of action and bedside application
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01069-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melania Cesarano, Domenico Luca Grieco, Teresa Michi, Laveena Munshi, Luca S. Menga, Luca Delle Cese, Ersilia Ruggiero, Tommaso Rosà, Daniele Natalini, Michael C. Sklar, Salvatore L. Cutuli, Filippo Bongiovanni, Gennaro De Pascale, Bruno L. Ferreyro, Ewan C. Goligher, Massimo Antonelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 13% |
Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 13% |
Hungary | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,166,897
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#633
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,810
of 442,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.