Title |
Cloning and characterization of the lignin biosynthesis genes NcCSE and NcHCT from Neolamarckia cadamba
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMB Express, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13568-019-0860-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juncheng Li, Xiaoling Huang, Hao Huang, Heqiang Huo, Chi D. Nguyen, Ruiqi Pian, Huaqiang Li, Kunxi Ouyang, Xiaoyang Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 27% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,597,150
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#192
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,008
of 343,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.