↓ Skip to main content

Anterior knee pain post-multiple surgeries for tibia fracture effectively managed with infrapatellar fat pad injection: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 200)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Anterior knee pain post-multiple surgeries for tibia fracture effectively managed with infrapatellar fat pad injection: a case report
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, October 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40981-022-00573-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinju Obara, Rieko Oishi, Yuko Nakano, Shin Kurosawa, Satoki Inoue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,439,944
of 24,639,073 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#33
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,765
of 431,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,639,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.