↓ Skip to main content

Changes in the criticality of Hopf bifurcations due to certain model reduction techniques in systems with multiple timescales

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Changes in the criticality of Hopf bifurcations due to certain model reduction techniques in systems with multiple timescales
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/2190-8567-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjun Zhang, Vivien Kirk, James Sneyd, Martin Wechselberger

Abstract

A major obstacle in the analysis of many physiological models is the issue of model simplification. Various methods have been used for simplifying such models, with one common technique being to eliminate certain 'fast' variables using a quasi-steady-state assumption. In this article, we show when such a physiological model reduction technique in a slow-fast system is mathematically justified. We provide counterexamples showing that this technique can give erroneous results near the onset of oscillatory behaviour which is, practically, the region of most importance in a model. In addition, we show that the singular limit of the first Lyapunov coefficient of a Hopf bifurcation in a slow-fast system is, in general, not equal to the first Lyapunov coefficient of the Hopf bifurcation in the corresponding layer problem, a seemingly counterintuitive result. Consequently, one cannot deduce, in general, the criticality of a Hopf bifurcation in a slow-fast system from the lower-dimensional layer problem.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
Israel 1 4%
United States 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 12 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%