↓ Skip to main content

Reading comprehension test fairness across gender and mode of learning: insights from IRT-based differential item functioning analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Language Testing in Asia, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Reading comprehension test fairness across gender and mode of learning: insights from IRT-based differential item functioning analysis
Published in
Language Testing in Asia, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40468-022-00192-3
Authors

Elahe Moradi, Zargham Ghabanchi, Reza Pishghadam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Materials Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,945,879
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Language Testing in Asia
#147
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,390
of 434,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Testing in Asia
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.