| Title |
Evaluation of closed-loop U-Tube deep borehole heat exchanger in the Basal Cambrian Sandstone formation, Alberta, Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geothermal Energy, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40517-022-00229-z |
| Authors |
Qinwan Chong, Jingyi Wang, Ian D. Gates |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 27% |
| Energy | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#18,936,243
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#113
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,294
of 441,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.