| Title |
Herpesviridae lung reactivation and infection in patients with severe COVID-19 or influenza virus pneumonia: a comparative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01062-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles-Edouard Luyt, Sonia Burrel, David Mokrani, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Domitille Luyt, Juliette Chommeloux, Vincent Guiraud, Nicolas Bréchot, Matthieu Schmidt, Guillaume Hekimian, Alain Combes, David Boutolleau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,417,965
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#313
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,974
of 436,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.