The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Shallow volcanic reservoirs and pathways beneath Aso caldera revealed using ambient seismic noise tomography
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40623-018-0941-2 |
Authors |
Yu-Chih Huang, Takahiro Ohkura, Tsuneomi Kagiyama, Shin Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Inoue |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 59% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#518
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,443
of 363,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.