| Title |
Misconceiving patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) as primarily a reporting requirement rather than a quality improvement tool: perceptions of independent healthcare sector stakeholders in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-022-00511-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Anderson, Emma Pitchforth, Andrew Vallance-Owen, Elias Mossialos, Paul Millner, Jon Fistein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,975,905
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#136
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,691
of 434,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.