↓ Skip to main content

Seismic analysis, design, and retrofit of built-environments: a procedural review of current practices and case studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Seismic analysis, design, and retrofit of built-environments: a procedural review of current practices and case studies
Published in
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s43065-022-00056-3
Authors

Ju-Hyung Kim, Christopher J. Hessek, Yail J. Kim, Hong-Gun Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 50%
Unspecified 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,865,133
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
#21
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,361
of 438,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them